Archive for caithnessnotorg The Antidote to 'e' org
 


       caithnessnotorg Forum Index -> General Forum
cait

what happened to the sleverer?

i miss his incisive insight and his wit.  Confused
mrsbradey

Re: what happened to the sleverer?

cait wrote:
i miss his incisive insight and his wit.  Confused


Wit, you say?

I think he ran off after 'that' football match!!!
cait

the sleverer dealt with the bully in the way bullies don't like. effectively.  Very Happy
mrsbradey

cait wrote:
the sleverer dealt with the bully in the way bullies don't like. effectively.  Very Happy


He's not been on since his comments about some ones Mammy, think he went quite after the Footy match, maybe he ate one of those minging pies he was on about!!
RagnarRocks

I heard he had gone south when shrien dewani came back on the market
cait

mrsbradey wrote:
cait wrote:
the sleverer dealt with the bully in the way bullies don't like. effectively.  Very Happy


He's not been on since his comments about some ones Mammy, think he went quite after the Footy match, maybe he ate one of those minging pies he was on about!!

see my previous post in this thread.
mrsbradey

cait wrote:
the sleverer dealt with the bully in the way bullies don't like. effectively.  Very Happy


I don't think effectively dealt with is the correct way to describe comments about 'fisting' someones elderly mother behind a shed!!!

Tantamount to cyber rape if you ask me, then it could just be hyperbole as I suspect many of the other blustery posts on here and other forums are!!
RagnarRocks

I suspect he is far to cowardly to utter such statements face to face, from the pic I've seen of him he's no more than a scrawny wee maggot
cait

mrsbradey wrote:
cait wrote:
the sleverer dealt with the bully in the way bullies don't like. effectively.  Very Happy


I don't think effectively dealt with is the correct way to describe comments about 'fisting' someones elderly mother behind a shed!!!

Tantamount to cyber rape if you ask me, then it could just be hyperbole as I suspect many of the other blustery posts on here and other forums are!!

i don't recall seeing any post about fisting, maybe it was removed before i could see it.
however, there is no doubt that the bully on both orgs scared more than one poster with his threats to come and visit them to sort them out, yet his presence here is condoned by admin and members alike.
cait

please come back chordie. we miss you're incisive wit and your fragrant posting style.  Very Happy
mrsbradey

cait wrote:
please come back chordie. we miss you're incisive wit and your fragrant posting style.  Very Happy


Really! I don't think so!!
RagnarRocks

Always amuses me how cait witters on about people being banned off the other org but has been banned off it as well. Pot Kettle Black Symdrome springs to mind.
Mind just being an annoying litte runt seems to be its reason for existence.
cait

mrsbradey wrote:
cait wrote:
please come back chordie. we miss your incisive wit and your fragrant posting style.  Very Happy


Really! I don't think so!!

i miss him. He had a lot of people down to a tee, and he dealt with them with consummate ease.
RagnarRocks

cait wrote:
mrsbradey wrote:
cait wrote:
please come back chordie. we miss your incisive wit and your fragrant posting style.  Very Happy


Really! I don't think so!!

i miss him. He had a lot of people down to a tee, and he dealt with them with consummate ease.



As he is the one who is no longer here I'd suggest it was him who was dealt with consumate  ease having outstayed his welcome..maybe you desire a similar happy ending !
cait

come back chordie. we miss you.  Sad
RagnarRocks

cait wrote:
come back chordie. we miss you.  Sad


The other day someone mentioned they thought you might be Splodge i of course laughed at the suggestion that you could possibly be such a fat useless money grubbing politically naive individual, they seemed to think that description was pretty apt having met the person in question but they also said Splodge is like a Stalinist  who doesn't appreciate freedom of speech and try's to suppress other people's view.

Funny how she's disappeared since embarrassing herself so comprehensively with the electorate of Caithness
Niall Fernie

I believe that sleveran geordie was banned by the Admin of this site, just as they were banned from Caithness.Org.

So maybe the concept of banning is ok after all and that you all shouldn't get up on your high horses about it so much.
RagnarRocks

Niall Fernie wrote:
I believe that sleveran geordie was banned by the Admin of this site, just as they were banned from Caithness.Org.

So maybe the concept of banning is ok after all and that you all shouldn't get up on your high horses about it so much.


That would depend on what youre banned for of course.
Jax

Niall Fernie wrote:
I believe that sleveran geordie was banned by the Admin of this site, just as they were banned from Caithness.Org.

So maybe the concept of banning is ok after all and that you all shouldn't get up on your high horses about it so much.


Fuck off
mrsbradey

RagnarRocks wrote:
Niall Fernie wrote:
I believe that sleveran geordie was banned by the Admin of this site, just as they were banned from Caithness.Org.

So maybe the concept of banning is ok after all and that you all shouldn't get up on your high horses about it so much.


That would depend on what youre banned for of course.


Exactly I don't remember threatening to fist Niall's mother!!
admin

Niall Fernie wrote:
I believe that sleveran geordie was banned by the Admin of this site, just as they were banned from Caithness.Org.

So maybe the concept of banning is ok after all and that you all shouldn't get up on your high horses about it so much.


Unlike the Admin of your site, chordie was given two warnings by us he apologised twice, but then went on to engage in  a disgusting onslaught with one of our founding members, and we the Admin were not prepared to tolerate this.

We just hope that if the chordie returns to this site in another guise, that he will behave himself.

It worth pointing out that the original concept for this forum was to allow freedom of speech without rules or excessive moderation. This I think has more or less been a success. The Admin of this site will not make promises that will be broken, unlike yourself mr Niall.

Regards,

Admin.
ducati

Niall Fernie wrote:
I believe that sleveran geordie was banned by the Admin of this site, just as they were banned from Caithness.Org.

So maybe the concept of banning is ok after all and that you all shouldn't get up on your high horses about it so much.


And.. it seems they were a sick sock puppet set up by you to try to ruin this site, I think that was an epic fail. Like Jax says, Fuck off you sad shite.
Niall Fernie

At least at I have a large flourishing community website.  Here there just seems to about 3 or 4 bitter individuals who think they've achieved something.  They have - made complete feckless tits out of themselves.
Jax

Niall Fernie wrote:
At least at I have a large flourishing community website.  Here there just seems to about 3 or 4 bitter individuals who think they've achieved something.  They have - made complete feckless tits out of themselves.


i think its yourself who has made a tit of themselves. I'm not bitter and I dont associate with folks that arent honest, such as yourself
Niall Fernie

Well just you carry on with your handful of sock puppet friends. I notice you couldn't even keep the interest of Johno the local village idiot.
mrsbradey

Niall Fernie wrote:
Well just you carry on with your handful of sock puppet friends. I notice you couldn't even keep the interest of Johno the local village idiot.
well thats nice!!

and what are your qualifications in the idiot dept?

I notice that your webshite (no typo) may be flourishing, your forum is not! has the red bag been handed in yet or is theoneandonly still driving around with his fog lights on???

oh and what time do the xmas lights get turned on in Shitsville??? Evil or Very Mad
ducati

Niall Fernie wrote:
At least at I have a large flourishing community website.  Here there just seems to about 3 or 4 bitter individuals who think they've achieved something.  They have - made complete feckless tits out of themselves.


What are you wasting your time here for then? On you go.
Niall Fernie

I don't make money from a General Forum so they can all talk about whatever banal shit they want. But I do make money from a flourishing community site - and it is indeed flourishing (Ka-Ching!)
RagnarRocks

[quote="Niall Fernie:7471"]I don't make money from a General Forum so they can all talk about whatever banal shit they want. But I do make money from a flourishing community site - and it is indeed flourishing (Ka-Ching!)[/quote

Except we aren't stupid and when you look at the sites traffic volume,which is what web advertising is paid on, and it is way down ....not kerching..let's face it e org is worth less than £10k that's a bit of pocket fluff hardly a thriving business.
Niall Fernie

Well that goes to show what little you know about the business model. Click through advertising and GoogleAds is not how we make the main dosh.
cait

Jax wrote:
Niall Fernie wrote:
I believe that sleveran geordie was banned by the Admin of this site, just as they were banned from Caithness.Org.

So maybe the concept of banning is ok after all and that you all shouldn't get up on your high horses about it so much.


Fuck off

this post made me laugh so much. it cuts through the shit like no recent post.

thanks for making my night.  Very Happy
cait

ducati wrote:
Niall Fernie wrote:
I believe that sleveran geordie was banned by the Admin of this site, just as they were banned from Caithness.Org.

So maybe the concept of banning is ok after all and that you all shouldn't get up on your high horses about it so much.


And.. it seems they were a sick sock puppet set up by you to try to ruin this site, I think that was an epic fail. Like Jax says, Fuck off you sad shite.

another post that made me smile. not as good as jax's original though. Smile
cait

a post from the real niall would make this thread.  Very Happy
Niall Fernie

admin wrote:
 a disgusting onslaught with one of our founding members


What, ragnarrocks ?  The kiddie with ADHD ?  He seems pretty able to spit filth out on both channels.

admin wrote:
The Admin of this site will not make promises that will be broken, unlike yourself mr Niall..


What promises were that ?  YOU were the one that sent me the grovelling email saying you'd close this board if I let you and a couple of your sock puppets back.
cait

where's the real niall? i want the real niall to spit on.
Niall Fernie

cait wrote:
where's the real niall? i want the real niall to spit on.


Shall I just tell them who your sock puppets are then ?
cait

oh no, you mustn't do that. i'll hold my spittal.  Very Happy
admin

Niall Fernie wrote:
admin wrote:
 a disgusting onslaught with one of our founding members


What, ragnarrocks ?  The kiddie with ADHD ?  He seems pretty able to spit filth out on both channels.

admin wrote:
The Admin of this site will not make promises that will be broken, unlike yourself mr Niall..


What promises were that ?  YOU were the one that sent me the grovelling email saying you'd close this board if I let you and a couple of your sock puppets back.


Closing this board was never an option and was never intimated as such.

An email may have been sent at the time of your bogus offer of reinstatement and those sock puppets I imagine you are referring to were my wife and her nephew.

Admin.
RagnarRocks

If it were down to me I'd just drop the axe of the pair of you but I'm far more intolerant than our admin and big enough to look after myself if I ever come across either of you face to face. A bit like john little + a bit
RagnarRocks

Buh bye wee man you're gone  Embarassed
Jax

cait wrote:
Jax wrote:
Niall Fernie wrote:
I believe that sleveran geordie was banned by the Admin of this site, just as they were banned from Caithness.Org.

So maybe the concept of banning is ok after all and that you all shouldn't get up on your high horses about it so much.


Fuck off

this post made me laugh so much. it cuts through the shit like no recent post.

thanks for making my night.  Very Happy


There is one thing you may notice Cait, I dont mess about straight I go straight  to the point
MownkeyDan

Jax wrote:
There is one thing you may notice Cait, I dont mess about straight I go straight  to the point


You also seem to be suffering from a touch of Fernie-ism yourself though....I read a post this morning which suggested your multiple accounts on the Org were from the same mac address.  Why delete that ?  Everybody does it.  Selectively deleting messages that don't suit your agenda just feeds the fool that is Fernie as he then mouths off and gloats to the Org Mods about you being contradictory for doing exactly the things you accused him of.
Jax

MownkeyDan wrote:
Jax wrote:
There is one thing you may notice Cait, I dont mess about straight I go straight  to the point


You also seem to be suffering from a touch of Fernie-ism yourself though....I read a post this morning which suggested your multiple accounts on the Org were from the same mac address.  Why delete that ?  Everybody does it.  Selectively deleting messages that don't suit your agenda just feeds the fool that is Fernie as he then mouths off and gloats to the Org Mods about you being contradictory for doing exactly the things you accused him of.


I aint deleted any posts perhaps the other admin has? I shall find out.
admin

MownkeyDan wrote:
Jax wrote:
There is one thing you may notice Cait, I dont mess about straight I go straight  to the point


You also seem to be suffering from a touch of Fernie-ism yourself though....I read a post this morning which suggested your multiple accounts on the Org were from the same mac address.  Why delete that ?  Everybody does it.  Selectively deleting messages that don't suit your agenda just feeds the fool that is Fernie as he then mouths off and gloats to the Org Mods about you being contradictory for doing exactly the things you accused him of.


Are yes that would be I that deleted the post referred to above. it was deleted by accident as I had answered the question that a bogus 'Niall' had posted, unfortunately the part I answered was inside the quote, so I deleted the post not thinking it would delete the original post, oops.

For those interested the post went something like;

         Niall Fernie,....  were there any other 'family' posting from the same MAC address?

To which I responded,........ I don't see that as any of your business.

I will be more careful in future.

Regards,

Admin,
cait

how would he get your mac address? i thought a website could only pick up your ip address.  Question
RagnarRocks

Sock puppets galore on the go I'd give admin a suggestion of a good song by queen
Another one Bites the dust !
And just go for it .
MownkeyDan

Your MAC address is contained in the data when you post to this and any other forum.  Which is how you know a sock puppet.  Using the IP address is no use as its either too general (like a local BT link) or could be genuine multiple users (like a company network).

The MAC address doesn't say who you are or doesn't locate you, but it pinpoints the source of the data to a unique device.  And you can look up what the type of device is in most cases.

That's how the Polis manage to prove a lot of the paedo cases.  The only defence then is "someone else was using my computer/laptop/mobile".
admin

MownkeyDan wrote:
The only defence then is "someone else was using my computer/laptop/mobile".


Exactly. There could be upto seven people in Admin HQ using the same device, how are they 'sock puppets'?

Regards,

Admin.
cait

MownkeyDan wrote:
Your MAC address is contained in the data when you post to this and any other forum.

are you sure? i thought the data at any point contained only the mac address from the previous point in the chain.

you can tell i don't know much about all this.  Confused
RagnarRocks

Having had a discussion with Niall about accounts on the phone he works under the assumption that one piece of equipment using the same number is the same person. He doesn't realise the far reaching implications of such an assumption with the data commissioners but hey ho what do I know about such things.
cait

was the 'niall fernie' posting on this thread the real thing, or was it just another imposter?
ducati

cait wrote:
was the 'niall fernie' posting on this thread the real thing, or was it just another imposter?


It wasn't the real thing the first time, why would it be the second time?  Rolling Eyes
mrsbradey

ducati wrote:
cait wrote:
was the 'niall fernie' posting on this thread the real thing, or was it just another imposter?


It wasn't the real thing the first time, why would it be the second time?  Rolling Eyes


I think it was Mr sleveverer himself, one of his 'many' alter egos I suspect!!

They all seem to have fecked off, or bin silenced, or summik far more sinister!!!
RagnarRocks

mrsbradey wrote:
ducati wrote:
cait wrote:
was the 'niall fernie' posting on this thread the real thing, or was it just another imposter?


It wasn't the real thing the first time, why would it be the second time?  Rolling Eyes


I think it was Mr sleveverer himself, one of his 'many' alter egos I suspect!!

They all seem to have fecked off, or bin silenced, or summik far more sinister!!!


Maybe with all those schizophrenic online personalities he's finally had a schism and been sectioned for his own safety. Poor wee bairn certainly wasn't well !
MownkeyDan

RagnarRocks wrote:
Maybe with all those schizophrenic online personalities he's finally had a schism and been sectioned for his own safety. Poor wee bairn certainly wasn't well !


But aren't you a sock puppet of Johno ?
cait

ducati wrote:
cait wrote:
was the 'niall fernie' posting on this thread the real thing, or was it just another imposter?


It wasn't the real thing the first time, why would it be the second time?  Rolling Eyes

people seemed to know who he was and post serious replies.
mrsbradey

cait wrote:
ducati wrote:
cait wrote:
was the 'niall fernie' posting on this thread the real thing, or was it just another imposter?


It wasn't the real thing the first time, why would it be the second time?  Rolling Eyes

people seemed to know who he was and post serious replies.


All my replies are serious!! Rolling Eyes
cait

doubly serious! Very Happy
RagnarRocks

MownkeyDan wrote:
RagnarRocks wrote:
Maybe with all those schizophrenic online personalities he's finally had a schism and been sectioned for his own safety. Poor wee bairn certainly wasn't well !


But aren't you a sock puppet of Johno ?



I see you're back with another name mr dumb fuck
mrsbradey

cait wrote:
doubly serious! Very Happy


Quadrupaly serious (although not always spelt correctly)!!
cait

mrsbradey wrote:
cait wrote:
doubly serious! Very Happy


Quadrupaly serious (although not always spelt correctly)!!

ooohh, you removed one of them.  Confused
cait

more mownkey business would be good.  Very Happy
mrsbradey

Eh?
RagnarRocks

mrsbradey wrote:
Eh?


It's reffering to the latest reincarnation
RagnarRocks

cait wrote:
more mownkey business would be good.  Very Happy

cait

mrsbradey wrote:
Eh?

more mownkey business would be good for all of us.
RagnarRocks

mrsbradey

RagnarRocks wrote:
What film is the above image from? I recognise it but can't remember!

       caithnessnotorg Forum Index -> General Forum
Page 1 of 1
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum